3 ms·
> Again, person dependent but missing the point. Would have it been more accurate to say they have 1.4327 engineers on the project? You're reading too far, thi
by ausudhz 5y ago
> Again, person dependent but missing the point. Would have it been more accurate to say they have 1.4327 engineers on the project?
You're reading too far, this is not the point of my comment?
As you mentioned on the part below I was highlighting that they didn't want to put dedicated resource on the projects. The rest is just your own imagination ramping up to assume that I meant something else.
And yes, we didn't know before that was one engineer doing also PM work. But so said, would've been more effective to have an engineer doing the work and a PM on two projects. Is easier to switch between managing stuff than engineering stuff.
- adjkant 5y ago> The rest is just your own imagination ramping up to assume that I meant something else. I mean it was a direct claim in your comment I was responding to, literally quoted which is the claim that someone on two project is "not really that effective". I'm simply offering my experiences that don't always match that. That's not my imagination there. No one here was arguing about that they clearly did not resource it in a meaningful way (I said as much in my post), that's not what this thread is discussing though...