3 ms·

That thread [1] is 4 years old. Is there recent credible evidence of ReFS being problematic? 1. https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/67h28o/bit_rot_d

• technion 5y ago
  Microsoft's documentation still refers to recommending NTFS "for general use" and then list specific places it's designed for. Also listed features still not available often make it a show stopper: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs... Most Hyper-V admins will be familiar with this thread which is still completely accurate. This is relevant as it's "by design" and won't change or be fixed. https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2286588-please-do-not-use-refs-for-cluster-shared-volumes-provided-by-a-san https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2286588-please-do-not... Here's a Veeam thread from 2019 talking about ongoing bugs: https://forums.veeam.com/veeam-backup-replication-f2/windows-2019-large-refs-and-deletes-t57726.html https://forums.veeam.com/veeam-backup-replication-f2/windows...