> it feels that is not designed to solve the CSAM problem but to look good on someone CV It feels like it's designed to protect customers from being accused of

> it feels that is not designed to solve the CSAM problem but to look good on someone CV It feels like it's designed to protect customers from being accused of having kiddie porn (by prosecutors who issue a dragnet warrant of everyone who had a single positive result) Dragnet warrants on location data have become very common. >Google says geofence warrants make up one-quarter of all US demands https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/19/google-geofence-warrants/ https://techcrunch.com/2021/08/19/google-geofence-warrants/ The solution to resisting these warrants is to never have access to the scan results, until you are reasonably sure there is a real problem. By setting a threshold of 30 positive results before you can see any of the scan results, customers are much more protected from the inevitable false positives.