2 ms·
>in fact a better solution is to have a constellation at lower orbits only that this turns the cost of something that is already very very expensive into somet
by senectus1 5y ago
>in fact a better solution is to have a constellation at lower orbits
only that this turns the cost of something that is already very very expensive into something that is hideously ridiculously expensive.
- evgen 5y agoNo it doesn’t. The major cost is not the satellite structure, it is getting up there. Low orbit costs significantly less.