3 ms·
Those people would say its a waste because they're imagining energy as a medium for the delivery of physical things. When energy fails to deliver something phys
by coralreef 5y ago
Those people would say its a waste because they're imagining energy as a medium for the delivery of physical things. When energy fails to deliver something physical, they view it as a waste.
Money and value are social abstractions, not physical things. As an example: without trust in a government, fiat money would not function, and would become valueless.
Energy is the link between the physical world and the social-abstract human world.
- trinovantes 5y agoI think it's a waste because that energy could've went to more productive on-demand energy-intensive uses like electrolysis, desalination, or carbon capture
- coralreef 5y agoThat's false because the energy capacity for those things was there already, and those things did not grow and proliferate to consume energy the way you see Bitcoin consuming energy. The problem with those processes is no one is willing to pay for them, ie. no profit incentive. That is a separate issue involving public spending and creating incentives to support industry. What you've done is imagine ways to spend money/energy that isn't yours for a greater public good, which is pretty easy but otherwise overly simplistic.