5 ms·
> It was a rather gentle collision at around 2.4km per > second; lower than the speed of sound Is that the speed of sound through solid rock, or should that
by biot 15y ago
> It was a rather gentle collision at around 2.4km per
> second; lower than the speed of sound
Is that the speed of sound through solid rock, or should that be m/s instead?
- ominous_prime 15y agoNo, that's about right. Seismic waves propagate between 2-8 km/s depending on rock density. 2.4 m/s is an easy run for most people.
- biot 15y agoI suppose that's the problem with speeds in space... 2.4 km/s would be anything but "a gentle collision" on Earth.
- ericd 15y agoThat's kind of strange, "speed of sound" in a mainstream publication almost certainly means the speed of sound through air at sea level (~.3 km/sec)
- Symmetry 15y agoBut if the scientist or paper talked about the speed of sound while referring to sound in rock, would the science reporter have realized that this wasn't the speed of sound in air? In my experience of science reporting in mainstream publications: no.
- ericd 15y agoThat might very well be the source of the strangeness :-)