3 ms·
I agree that I find lifetimes a bit hard to read, but outside of that I usually find Rust's syntax really clear for an algol-like. For example, they use the ML-
by Zababa 5y ago
I agree that I find lifetimes a bit hard to read, but outside of that I usually find Rust's syntax really clear for an algol-like. For example, they use the ML-style type declaration variable: type, which I find more readable than the C-like type variable. There's a different syntax for namespace and function chaining, which I also like.