Ultimately that’s not why they bought them anyway. So no, not really That's not relevant to the fact that limiting competition was their very first considerati

Ultimately that’s not why they bought them anyway. So no, not really That's not relevant to the fact that limiting competition was their very first consideration. And other competitors were seen as lesser value because of their location, not to mention the fact that the reply to that argument was that just talking to them would still hurt competition by making any acquisition more expensive. Just because Google ultimately found YouTube to be valuable doesn't change the fact that their first motive was to limit competition.