2 ms·

On second thought, apparently you do understand what the term "script-kiddies" means. The real problem in your original sentence "What have these 'script-kiddie

• rvz 5y ago
  > The real problem in your original sentence "What have these 'script-kiddies' and 'hacktivists' achieved" is that you misused the word "these". If you had read the Gizmodo article, you would find that they mentioned that '...trolls flooded the digital tip line with everything from Shrek porn to phony tips' and linked another previously reported article which again covers the methods used to attack and flood the website, before then detailing to others about another effective way to get GoDaddy to shut down the website for ToS violations. These sort of flooding and attacks are what can be described as script-kiddie and hacktivist behaviour as I already said before. I assumed you have at least 'read' the Gizmodo article and its links. You clearly have not. When asked to elaborate further on your original claim of '...misusing the terms "script-kiddies" and "hacktivists"' you couldn't substantiate anything. Now you retreat to attacking another 'argument' and thinking I misused the word 'these'. So even after bringing up more relevant links and citations to support my own claims on top of what Gizmodo already mentioned, another person who also didn't read the article now says it makes sense and then you suggest I'm defending a strawman argument? Have I just proved that both of you just read only the title of the Gizmodo article?