Sort of. They make sure the GMs or Chief Editors understand the agenda or what not to write about. Otherwise, it's selection bias. The people they elevate int

Sort of. They make sure the GMs or Chief Editors understand the agenda or what not to write about. Otherwise, it's selection bias. The people they elevate into editorial power are true believers of the agenda they want to support. Ex 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4sNoKJqj7k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4sNoKJqj7k Skip past the hype, the key phrase from the GM (paraphrased) "Sometimes it's not about the viewer, it's about what your CEO reads" Ex 2: Sean Hannity and Rachel Maddow are both examples promoting someone who is a true believer of an agenda being promoted and given a big platform to expound those views. This is why the elite doesn't have to coerce key public figures; those public figures can only get in that position if they are loyal to the agenda.