It's a bit queasy IMO. I really, really, really disliked it when the animal rights activists in Britain pushed the banks to cancel the accounts of some customer

It's a bit queasy IMO. I really, really, really disliked it when the animal rights activists in Britain pushed the banks to cancel the accounts of some customers. But in this case Godaddy had a ToS and the site is in clear violation. IMO most those ToSes and EULAs are dubious, but this particular case isn't. Arguing to restrict what a ToS or EULA can say would be a good thing, but supporting that argument with the poor mistreated texan lynch mob... no. Surely another case will come by with more sympathetic victims.