"Closed source" is a pretty poor analogy, since regular executables can be disassembled or even decompiled. Reversing is a big field. DRM and obfuscation to pre

"Closed source" is a pretty poor analogy, since regular executables can be disassembled or even decompiled. Reversing is a big field. DRM and obfuscation to prevent that reversing is a better analogy. How is it different from that? It isn't, really.