n 2004, New Scientist, published an open letter from Eric Lerner and about 30 other scientists,[1] criticizing the Big Bang theory, and noting that Big Bang the

n 2004, New Scientist, published an open letter from Eric Lerner and about 30 other scientists,[1] criticizing the Big Bang theory, and noting that Big Bang theory requires Dark Matter to exists. «Without some kind of dark matter, unlike any that we have observed on Earth despite 20 years of experiments, big-bang theory makes contradictory predictions for the density of matter in the universe. Inflation requires a density 20 times larger than that implied by big bang nucleosynthesis, the theory’s explanation of the origin of the light elements. And without dark energy, the theory predicts that the universe is only about 8 billion years old, which is billions of years younger than the age of many stars in our galaxy.» Can we finally abandon Big Shrink (BS) theory? It's obvious now that Oort cloud of Shapley attractor just collided with Dipole Repeller cloud [2]. [1]: https://www.plasma-universe.com/an-open-letter-to-the-scientific-community/ https://www.plasma-universe.com/an-open-letter-to-the-scient... [2]: https://vimeo.com/189355968 https://vimeo.com/189355968