6 ms·
This sounds like a reasonable trade off which doesn’t hVe the risk of uprooting people from their primary residence.
by lifty 5y ago
This sounds like a reasonable trade off which doesn’t hVe the risk of uprooting people from their primary residence.
- R0b0t1 5y agoI like it too, but it seems to incentivize sprawl. If people attempt to lease land the LVT will be passed to their tenants. To avoid paying the LVT, tenants will look for new construction.
- lotsofpulp 5y agoHigher fossil fuel taxes would counter the sprawl incentive.
- nextaccountic 5y agoIsn't this a good thing? The more constructions, the more housing.