3 ms·
If that means middle income families or starters are not able to buy those houses, and the investors driving the prices up. Then yes, it’s a problem.
by winkelwagen 5y ago
If that means middle income families or starters are not able to buy those houses, and the investors driving the prices up. Then yes, it’s a problem.
- keewee7 5y agoWhy should middle income families be able to buy property in some of the wealthiest and most expensive cities in the world? There is suburbs for that.
- bsksi 5y agoSuburbs? What do you think we are, Americans?
- keewee7 5y agoI'm Danish and we call it "forstad". It's pretty much the same as a suburb. https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forstad https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forstad
- bsksi 5y agoI know they exist. What I'm saying is that European cities are built around the idea of people being able to live in walking distance of... Everything. Suburbs here exist for snobs and assholes.
- leoedin 5y agoThe problem of inflated house prices extends to the suburbs and beyond
- mcv 5y agoThe fact that those cities are so expensive is exactly the problem. Those cities are healthier if they have a healthy mix of different population groups. I live in Amsterdam and would hate to see it become a rich people's ghetto, though it's definitely at risk of that happening. Maybe it already is.
- II2II 5y agoWhere are the people who work in those cities supposed to live? Are they expected to commute an hour a day, diminishing their earning potential and increasing their expenses? People in the wealthiest cities also tend to have access to more resources, due to the concentration and diversity of the population. Denying low and middle income families access also diminishes their potential, while diminishing the potential of cities through the reduction of diversity. At best, this sounds an argument to hold people back. At worse, it sound like an argument to push people down.