3 ms·
This is pretty much what makes it an increasingly difficult sell as an application scales up, and untenable for me personally - at some point, something mission
by primitivesuave 5y ago
This is pretty much what makes it an increasingly difficult sell as an application scales up, and untenable for me personally - at some point, something mission critical like emails cannot be in the hands of a third party, let alone in the hands of a client-side library.
- albertgoeswoof 5y agoHow are you sending emails if not via a 3rd party?
- primitivesuave 5y agoI should clarify that statement to - I don't wish to involve a 3rd party I don't trust (e.g. small startup) in handling transactions with 3rd parties I trust (e.g. Amazon SES, Mailgun, Sendgrid, etc). I don't mean to imply that the proprietors of this service are not fully capable of creating a great system, however I am fairly certain that most decision makers on using something like this would take pause where I did.
- hirako2000 5y agoYou are putting a lot of trust in mailgun, sendgrid and Amazon. Beside, when integrity and confidentiality is critical, the solution is crypto signature and encryption. Not the trust in supposedly reputable 3rd parties.
- toomanybeersies 5y agoWhen integrity and confidentiality is critical, the solution is to not use email at all, and use in-app messaging instead.
- hirako2000 5y agothat's also true.
- emailjs 5y agothe EmailJS service is not a mail agent. It is not suitable for corporate correspondence; that is not its purpose. However, you can use the service to initiate the conversation.