4 ms·
It's certainly a failing of the flawed US democracy, but fortunately there are much better ways to implement democracies.
by flailingroof 5y ago
It's certainly a failing of the flawed US democracy, but fortunately there are much better ways to implement democracies.
- marcinzm 5y agoThey all have their flaws. Parliamentary democracies, for example, are susceptible to minority extreme views having massive weight if they are needed to keep a coalition in power. Direct democracies are the opposite with minority views being ignored. edit: Also, one needs to separate the impact of the democratic system from that of the social/cultural system. A country with a very homogenous population tends to have less issues under any system of government.
- flailingroof 5y agoYes, but "no perfect option" doesn't imply "no better option". I could also counter that the extra weight to "minority extreme views" is much less of an issue than most votes in most US states being meaningless because of the first past the post system on a state basis. But I don't really see this as a meaningful discussion, it's undebatable that the US system is flawed to the point where it can't be called a real democracy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]