3 ms·
> You mean a connection like being pushed as a cure for the same disease while lacking any substantial, peer-reviewed data to back it up? If you believed in sc
by zepto 5y ago
> You mean a connection like being pushed as a cure for the same disease while lacking any substantial, peer-reviewed data to back it up?
If you believed in science you’d know that’s a political connection not a scientific one.
> I think maybe we have different ideas of how science and the scientific method works.
Yes, you are mistaking politics for science.
More edits you dishonestly added after my reply:
“So you're not referring to any science at all, then? I'm unable to find any other published literature on the subject.”
- tomnipotent 5y agoHow is it ANY different from the current situation other than your own personal opinion? Moving the goal posts doesn't help your argument. > Yes, you are mistaking politics for science. This isn't very convincing. What makes your position non-political or more scientific? Talk about dishonesty.
- zepto 5y ago> How is it ANY different… How is what any different? > What makes your position non-political or more scientific? Talk about dishonesty. What position have I claimed is non-political or more scientific?
- tomnipotent 5y agoYou mean like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin? So because Trump talked about the former that somehow makes it political? What a weak argument.
- zepto 5y ago> So because Trump talked about the former that somehow makes it political and not scientific? What a weak argument. I think you should re-read the thread. The only person talking about Trump here is you.
- tomnipotent 5y agoThen explain why one was political and the other not? I'll wait.
- zepto 5y agoIt’s unclear what you are asking for. What claim do you think I am making that you want me to explain?