Put primate ( text) next to a white guy and no one would consider it as racist really, because it's correct. But next to a black person it's totally different.

Put primate ( text) next to a white guy and no one would consider it as racist really, because it's correct. But next to a black person it's totally different. Never mind history, i knew it was bad. But I wonder about the effects about "putting it to the center of attention" all the time. Can we fix and name problems that are based on culture and not on race anymore. For example: What would be the consequences of having a statement "i don't know of any problems with Asians who migrated to my country". While i say Asians, it's probably that the culture of them probably has less conflicts? Eg. In our prison ( not US), there is a over representation of certain foreign cultures, according to the numbers. How can we tell if that observation is factual correct and there is a problem with different cultures or if it's a consequence of racism. If that observation would be correct and there is a problem. How can we treat it, since we are not allowed to name it. ( Just to be sure, i am no racist. I'm just wondering out loud and it's very hard to find a place to properly discuss something like this. Which is part of the problem, no?)