4 ms·

It's just a warning; it lets you click through. They have things in the TOS about not sharing sensitive output publicly though. The warning looks like: > Compl

by moyix 5y ago

It's just a warning; it lets you click through. They have things in the TOS about not sharing sensitive output publicly though. The warning looks like: > Completion may contain sensitive content > Consider adjusting your prompt to keep completions appropriate. To turn off content warnings, update your preferences. They have some details about the content filter here; it seems to be much more sophisticated than just a bad word list: https://beta.openai.com/docs/engines/content-filter https://beta.openai.com/docs/engines/content-filter I also like that they distinguish between "sensitive" (talks about something potentially controversial) and "unsafe" (profanity, hate speech, etc.). This seems a lot more nuanced than what Copilot is doing.

Filligree 5y ago
> I also like that they distinguish between "sensitive" (talks about something potentially controversial) and "unsafe" (profanity, hate speech, etc.). This seems a lot more nuanced than what Copilot is doing. However, I wanted to use GPT-3 as a writing assistant. You know, to build a tool similar to what e.g. NovelAI has. Whatever dark magic they've done to GPT-J-6B is, well, hard to credit -- but GPT-3 is still better. There appears to be no way to do so while obeying the ToS. Not just because of sensitive content (e.g. fiction often contains violence), but there are even rules about how much of the output can be written by humans vs. the AI.
- NavinF 5y ago
  If this is for personal use, you could always ignore the ToS. It's not like they have copyright on the output. All openai can do is ban your account.
  - Filligree 5y ago
    That's true. I decided it wasn't worth the effort building a writing tool just for myself; I'd wanted to build something potentially profitable, and... this isn't it. GPT-3 isn't great at most things, but it's really good at being a writing aid for fiction, so it's a real pity they're doing their apparent best to prevent that. NovelAI is almost as good, so nowadays I'm just using that.

by moyix 5y ago

Filligree 5y ago

> I also like that they distinguish between "sensitive" (talks about something potentially controversial) and "unsafe" (profanity, hate speech, etc.). This seems a lot more nuanced than what Copilot is doing. However, I wanted to use GPT-3 as a writing assistant. You know, to build a tool similar to what e.g. NovelAI has. Whatever dark magic they've done to GPT-J-6B is, well, hard to credit -- but GPT-3 is still better. There appears to be no way to do so while obeying the ToS. Not just because of sensitive content (e.g. fiction often contains violence), but there are even rules about how much of the output can be written by humans vs. the AI.

NavinF 5y ago
If this is for personal use, you could always ignore the ToS. It's not like they have copyright on the output. All openai can do is ban your account.
- Filligree 5y ago
  That's true. I decided it wasn't worth the effort building a writing tool just for myself; I'd wanted to build something potentially profitable, and... this isn't it. GPT-3 isn't great at most things, but it's really good at being a writing aid for fiction, so it's a real pity they're doing their apparent best to prevent that. NovelAI is almost as good, so nowadays I'm just using that.