>...how is this different than a baker not making a cake for some particular customer? Yes, the argument can be made in these cases that there are two sides, s

>...how is this different than a baker not making a cake for some particular customer? Yes, the argument can be made in these cases that there are two sides, so someone's rights are being violated either way. But, there does seem to be a consistent quality here that the particular "infringed" right of one side is the "right" to deny others' rights. Might that be the difference?