4 ms·
>But if your position is that they shouldn't be looking at your data at all, then you have to go back to the first question and say "Apple should not be trying
by barbecue_sauce 5y ago
>But if your position is that they shouldn't be looking at your data at all, then you have to go back to the first question and say "Apple should not be trying to stop the exploitation of children."
You're getting pretty far into "affirming the consequent" territory here.
- jasonlfunk 5y agoThat's fair. I guess a better answer would be "Apple should not be trying to stop the exploitation of children by looking at user's data." But what else could they meaningfully do?