4 ms·
Sure, but as soon as you start naming names, it's pretty obvious that a lot of the people proposing alternative pronouns that don't really catch on or making cl
by notahacker 5y ago
Sure, but as soon as you start naming names, it's pretty obvious that a lot of the people proposing alternative pronouns that don't really catch on or making claims about their workplace are little-known ordinary middle class people without any real power, and some of the people declaring "war on woke" own media empires and sit in parliaments. Which places a different complexion on the "divide and conquer"...
- angelzen 5y agoOccupy Wall Street died when infected with identitarians. Unions, as weak and pathetic as they are, become a whole lot more interested in pronouns, systemic racism and illegal immigration than fighting for a decent wage and decent working conditions for their paying members. Politically, there is no more discourse on behalf of the poor or working classes, only for identitarian version thereof. With the obvious effect that the shunned identities naturally don't support erst left wing policies that exclude them on identity marker basis. Wokeness is a huge win for the ruling class. Divide and conquer at its best.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- weswpg 5y agoUnions have been on the decline for decades going back to the deregulatory and anti-labor policies of Neo liberal governments and that probably has a lot more to do with the problem than pronouns
- angelzen 5y agoYou've got cancer and then died of pneumonia. These are both deadly.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jpadkins 5y agoIt doesn't work like that. The people in power find people with an agenda that suits their agenda (woke identity politics that divide any populist movement). Then they elevate those people to places of more power or reach or status. This comes in the forms of grants, promotions, publications, and opening doors (making connections). You don't need to convince or coerce people to fit your agenda. You simply find them and elevate them.