3 ms·
I have read the Economist many times, although not in the last 5 years. And I would not call it "liberal" at all. I stopped because of the bias. Did the other
by SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
I have read the Economist many times, although not in the last 5 years. And I would not call it "liberal" at all. I stopped because of the bias.
Did the other topics that the Economist "devoted pages and pages to" get as much uptake here as this one?
- systemvoltage 5y agoI think they're pretty neutral. Perhaps your own stance has shifted away from the center instead? Something to consider.
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y agoI disagree, I stopped because of things that the Economist really were not neutral about, entire arguments that they omitted, things that they decided to paint as one-sided, which were in reality anything but. Maybe you think they're neutral because they confirm your existing biases? Something to consider.