4 ms·
> ARM either had a solid delivery of their new ISA in 2011, or MIPS 64 was going to kill them. > Betting their tenuous dominant market share on risky propositi
by klelatti 5y ago
> ARM either had a solid delivery of their new ISA in 2011, or MIPS 64 was going to kill them.
> Betting their tenuous dominant market share on risky propositions would be a fool’s errand —- doubly so for a soft IP company.
> It would also give a talking point to Intel that ARM was moving in their direction as proof x86 was a real competitor.
Sorry you're just making stuff up now. I'm happy to engage on a real comparison of the pros and cons of each architecture but this just isn't correct.