3 ms·

They are not using the wrong "medical" treatment. It is NOT a medical treatment, at all. In this case, 100% do NOT help them, if needs be. They are so proudly

They are not using the wrong "medical" treatment. It is NOT a medical treatment, at all. In this case, 100% do NOT help them, if needs be. They are so proudly and loudly anti-vax, anti-mask, inject bleach into their bloodstream, that they should get what they deserve. What I'm saying is that gunshot wounds, broken legs, stuff that is not the results of people taking eating poison on purpose, or not getting the Covid vaccine or not wearing masks - they should be lowest on the totem pole, and only treated when everyone else is done. End of story. And if someone comes in after some idiot is being treated for being an idiot, then they should get the idiot off the bed and make them lie on the floor, and put the person who has an actual real injury onto the bed. The person lies on the floor until the medical staff can get to them again, because there's only so many beds. That's what I think.

josephcsible 5y ago
Assuming for the sake of argument that you're right about ivermectin being a poison equivalent to bleach and not an FDA-approved medicine in humans, wouldn't your argument also lead to the conclusion that we shouldn't try to save people who attempt suicide?
- France_is_bacon 5y ago
  First, bleach was recommended by the idiot-in-chief, Donald Trump. So that was more or less me mocking him and his followers. However, the two are not equivalent. The reason is that by far, those who try to commit suicide are in a mentally incapacitated state. People with severe depression - it is not their fault that they were born with that genetic combination, and everyone who doesn't have it should be feeling pretty lucky. Same with those that are in severe physical chronic pain. I don't see how you could disagree with this. It's not the same thing at all. There are better examples you could have given, like a drunk driver that gets hurt in an accident that they caused. And for that argument, my response, which I have made in this thread to others who brought up that type of argument, if 900,000 people per year were dying of drunk driving, and millions and millions of drunk drivers were taking up ALL the hospital beds, the f-ck yes, put them as far down on the waiting list as possible. If anyone comes in with an accident or issue that wasn't caused by drunk driving, the drunk driver immediately gets bumped out of the hospital bed, no matter how traumatic their injuries are. Because f-ck drunk drivers, and f-ck the anti-maskers, anti-vaxers, and ivermectin users. And, as I stated before, the drunk drivers, the anti-maskers, the anti-vaxers, should refuse all medical treatment, and live by their shitty decisions. Drunk drivers know full well that they could cause accidents. They know full well. But they do it anyways. Same with anti-vaxers, and anti-maskers. Why be little b-tches about it, little crybabies, and expect a hospital bed? Just pretend it doesn't exist and stay the f-ck at home and die there, wrapped in their self-chosen deliberate idiocy. However, since only few drunk drivers actually come into the hospitals with injuries at the same time, not millions and millions over a year and a half, then yes, they can be treated because there are ample open beds and doctors, for the most part. Get it?
  - josephcsible 5y ago
    To be clear, are you saying that you think people opposed to the mask mandates are equivalent to/worse than drunk drivers?

josephcsible 5y ago

Assuming for the sake of argument that you're right about ivermectin being a poison equivalent to bleach and not an FDA-approved medicine in humans, wouldn't your argument also lead to the conclusion that we shouldn't try to save people who attempt suicide?

France_is_bacon 5y ago
First, bleach was recommended by the idiot-in-chief, Donald Trump. So that was more or less me mocking him and his followers. However, the two are not equivalent. The reason is that by far, those who try to commit suicide are in a mentally incapacitated state. People with severe depression - it is not their fault that they were born with that genetic combination, and everyone who doesn't have it should be feeling pretty lucky. Same with those that are in severe physical chronic pain. I don't see how you could disagree with this. It's not the same thing at all. There are better examples you could have given, like a drunk driver that gets hurt in an accident that they caused. And for that argument, my response, which I have made in this thread to others who brought up that type of argument, if 900,000 people per year were dying of drunk driving, and millions and millions of drunk drivers were taking up ALL the hospital beds, the f-ck yes, put them as far down on the waiting list as possible. If anyone comes in with an accident or issue that wasn't caused by drunk driving, the drunk driver immediately gets bumped out of the hospital bed, no matter how traumatic their injuries are. Because f-ck drunk drivers, and f-ck the anti-maskers, anti-vaxers, and ivermectin users. And, as I stated before, the drunk drivers, the anti-maskers, the anti-vaxers, should refuse all medical treatment, and live by their shitty decisions. Drunk drivers know full well that they could cause accidents. They know full well. But they do it anyways. Same with anti-vaxers, and anti-maskers. Why be little b-tches about it, little crybabies, and expect a hospital bed? Just pretend it doesn't exist and stay the f-ck at home and die there, wrapped in their self-chosen deliberate idiocy. However, since only few drunk drivers actually come into the hospitals with injuries at the same time, not millions and millions over a year and a half, then yes, they can be treated because there are ample open beds and doctors, for the most part. Get it?
- josephcsible 5y ago
  To be clear, are you saying that you think people opposed to the mask mandates are equivalent to/worse than drunk drivers?