5 ms·
This is all my guess. American institutions have completely lost the trust of the lesser-educated demographic, are oblivious to this phenomenon, and sneer at t
by ashleyn 5y ago
This is all my guess.
American institutions have completely lost the trust of the lesser-educated demographic, are oblivious to this phenomenon, and sneer at those who distrust them instead of trying to be conscious of it and correct it.
Something rotten is making livestock paste look a lot better to these people than taking a chance in a well-reputed doctor's office. What is driving the rural, poorly educated American to buy livestock medicine from the tractor supply store instead of going to the doctor? Let's put it this way, why do you and I go to the doctor? Would we still go there if we found the messengers of consensus, evidence-based medicine were saying and doing things we found untrustworthy or even worthy of moral condemnation?
Speaking on anecdotal experience of having grown up in rural America, you don't really ever admit you're afraid of anything, especially going to the doctor. Instead, you cover it up with anger, denial, and magical thinking. I used to think "essential oils" and the like were people genuinely falling victim to naturalistic fallacy but then ivermectin for COVID-19 happened. The name "ivermectin" doesn't really sound natural to me. It still sounds "medicine-y". But it's coming from a place you find more reputable than a doctor.
I think these people are shit scared to go to the doctor because they don't trust anything anyone on the TV tells them anymore. And why would that happen? Not necessarily that they're doing anything wrong, but they're tone deaf to this demographic, oblivious on how to communicate effectively to them. Call it an effect of class divide, perhaps.
So finally, they turn to people that, astoundingly, seem more trustworthy: far right figures on social media, naturopathic woo, you name it. Maybe they talk differently. Maybe they use themes and culture familiar to them. Or maybe they just don't straight up demean them like segments of the news media are wont to do.
If we fix a communication gap that potentially exists, how many more lives could we save instead of laughing and sneering at people confounded enough to choose horse dewormer over a well-tested vaccine?
- belltaco 5y ago>Something rotten is making livestock paste look a lot better to these people than taking a chance in a well-reputed doctor's office. What is driving the rural, poorly educated American to buy livestock medicine from the tractor supply store instead of going to the doctor? It started with Trump denying Covid was a threat because it'd tank the economy to take precautions against it before the elections. Of course it blew up anyway. So all the right wing media and pundits denied it was a danger. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAh4uS4f78o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAh4uS4f78o It's way easier to spread misinformation to gullible people than it is to counter it. The HCQ mania started with Fox News hosts misinterpreting studies and then telling Trump that it was a magic cure, the govt scientists were not in the loop. So when scientists tell the truth, suddenly it's their fault somehow. The party of personal responsibility should own up and stop blaming others for Republicans' propensity to fall for political and social media BS.
- robocat 5y agoArticle about that: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/vaccines-konstantin-kisin https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/vaccines-ko... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28409470 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28409470 Uses some very non-factual examples, but the general gist is good IMHO. Responding to a non factual article with more nonsense makes sense to me.