> I don't see the relevance. Doesn't physics do the job of exhaustively explaining that behavior at this point? Unless you believe in God, it's literally all j

> I don't see the relevance. Doesn't physics do the job of exhaustively explaining that behavior at this point? Unless you believe in God, it's literally all just physics, so the point stands. Rivers solving optimal flow paths is physics. Neurons solving commenting on hackernews is just physics too. And by the way our physical theories are terrible at solving fluid dynamics problems. There's a reason why wind tunnels are still a thing. It's because that way we can let the real physics solve for what our models can't. However, I'm reliably informed that we live in a material universe and I'm just matter that somehow started thinking, so therefore physics can explain why I'm posting this. I'm not sure how to get from F=ma to there, but assuredly it's solvable with enough computing power.