6 ms·
Yo (kind of:) There's the usual finance / banking guys. But also a lot of ERPs - the corporate bread and butter hr, Financials, crm, erm, scm, etc applications
by NikolaNovak 5y ago
Yo (kind of:)
There's the usual finance / banking guys. But also a lot of ERPs - the corporate bread and butter hr, Financials, crm, erm, scm, etc applications (I'm in this space, historically as sysadmin / light developer, then perf testing, infra architect, tech team lead, now as kind of a ops manager).
Over my 25 years and few dozen projects, mainframe was a significant portion of implementations and almost always at least on the table as potential platform.
Fwiw, What I always find fascinating though is that after many an implementation on "distributed platform", I. E. Unix Linux or Windows, as soon as any performance issue arises, there's a lot of calls to "move it back to mainframe" . I don't agree with that myself necessarily, but A lot of big enterprise shops feel that mainframe is an expensive pain, but reliable predictable well-performing expensive pain.
- algo_trader 5y ago> on "distributed platform", I. E. Unix Linux or Windows Is the mainframe really "more reliable" or "more performant" than a well provisioned cluster of commodity hw? I mean after 20 years of optimising the SW stack, and monster xeons and tera-memory and fibre-channels and SSDs and everything so cheap and accessible. Is it really tech or just corporate inertia keeping this industry alive? ;)
- jyounker 5y agoAs I recall, there have been something six attempts to move the airline scheduling systems off of mainframes, but the efforts keep failing to compete with the existing mainframes.