So what's the data? 30 school districts (out of how many?) use a book Rufo doesn't like. Any reason why anyone, aside from Rufo, should care? Half of the nat

So what's the data? 30 school districts (out of how many?) use a book Rufo doesn't like. Any reason why anyone, aside from Rufo, should care? Half of the nation doesn't teach sex ed because skyperson doesn't like when people bang without signing an exclusive banging agreement in public first. Half the nation teaches kids that the Confederacy was formed to protect "states' rights", carefully omitting that the right in question was to own black people as livestock[1]. But hey, 30 districts use a white-people-bad, and that's the real problem. And what does the last part of your comment (about AZ) have to do with anything? Telling educators that 5-year-olds can absorb shitty beliefs is now a cOnTrOvErSiAl tHeOrY? I don't even know where to start here, let's set this one aside. So, let's focus on this question first: assuming the book you mentioned is bad, which percentage of pubic schools use it, and in which way? [1] TX is my go-to example. They were teaching that slavery was a "side issue" in the Civil War when I was living there in 2010-2017. I'm not even going to bother dissecting the bullshit they peddle these days. Feel free to dig in. Texas oversees 1,247 school districts. Tell me more about the problem of CRT in schools though. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/texas-will-finally-teach-slavery-was-main-cause-civil-war-180970851/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/texas-will-finally...