> If anyone has better data sources, or fairer interpretations of this data, please reply! Same, it is so hard to get good data which also has good explanation

> If anyone has better data sources, or fairer interpretations of this data, please reply! Same, it is so hard to get good data which also has good explanations of how it was acquired so you don't make the wrong conclusions from it. I assume when the CDC says that they still believe the vaccine cons outweighs Covid's pros in that population that they had some good data-scientists run over much better data than what I'm finding on Google, but who knows, if the UK institutions conclude differently, is it they have worse or better data, why would they make a different conclusion? I feel Covid has exposed a need for better data across the board, and thing like reproducible data analysis would be very useful here.