I think the fundamental problem with project management software is poorly defined scope. There are features that involve project and portfolio-level reporting

I think the fundamental problem with project management software is poorly defined scope. There are features that involve project and portfolio-level reporting, forecasting, task assignment, feature definition, change-request management, team collaboration, etc. All of these are important, but maybe bundling is not the right answer at this point. I think that's why do much discussion comes down to "feature debate". Users talking about features they hate in their PM software and new software explaining they don't have those features. It's a discussion focused on reducing pain rather than productive benefit. It would be good to rethink what we really want from PM software, specifically, and how to optimize one or two core use cases. This is not criticism of Wormhole. It might be a great software, but it follows the same pattern of discussion "You know all those features you hate in your current PM software? Well, this software doesn't have those features." I don't want software that just sucks less. I want software that makes my life better.