3 ms·
Slightly off-topic question: how would you call these playable things embedded in HTML these days? I would like to use the word "applet" but it can be still con
by euske 5y ago
Slightly off-topic question: how would you call these playable things embedded in HTML these days? I would like to use the word "applet" but it can be still confusing to those who remember Java Applets. Any idea?
- ludwigschubert 5y agoI’ve seen other people use "interactives", "interactables", and "explorables" (as in "explorable explanation"). Those feel a little forced to me. At Distill we simply called them "figures" or "diagrams"; sometimes "interactive figures" or "interactive diagrams" when the distinction needed to be made.
- prideout 5y agoAgreed, "applet" is a self-documenting word, it's a shame that it is confusing! Personally I like the word "vignette" although I haven't seen it anybody else using it that way.
- dmlittle 5y agoSlightly off-topic answer: back in the day these used to be Java Applets so the original mathlets name is probably a pun on them.
- dhosek 5y agoOne of my grad school text books had interactive experiments based on Java Applets. I occasionally go back to work through the chapters we never finished and running the applets is a challenge. I think the last time I tried, I ended up finding a command-line interface to run an applet outside of the browser.
- j-james 5y agoI would call them interactive animations.