4 ms·
This. If you want to read more into the precise ordering of the neologism, it's agile sandwiched in the middle of waterfall. Which is to say, the upstream and
by ethbr0 5y ago
This. If you want to read more into the precise ordering of the neologism, it's agile sandwiched in the middle of waterfall.
Which is to say, the upstream and downstream didn't change how they do things at all, and somehow developers acting differently is supposed to convert everything to agile.
Or to put it another way, this is what you get when you tell everyone they need to "do agile" without actually retraining people on what that means and update processes to enable it.
Source: experience with healthcare "agile" and "sprints"
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoStronger: Somehow developers acting differently without the inputs that agile processes require is supposed to convert everything to agile. And somehow it never does...
- panzagl 5y agoIn practice most contractors end up hiring a bunch of former users to act as stand-ins for the real operators. These former users then get to engage in continual pissing matches with the acquisition office over how things really get done. Hilarity ensues.
- tablespoon 5y ago> Which is to say, the upstream and downstream didn't change how they do things at all, and somehow developers acting differently is supposed to convert everything to agile. Sounds like my corner of the private sector.
- Pokepokalypse 5y agoI know the solution! Hire a scrum-master! that will fix it.