No, the relevant question is: who gets to decide that we end up having this discussion? Mass surveillance is not an option. Even if it were, it would eventual

No, the relevant question is: who gets to decide that we end up having this discussion? Mass surveillance is not an option. Even if it were, it would eventually expose a wrong approach. Mitigating (systemic) child abuse does not necessitate flashy “crypto surveillance”. It asks for well educated and vigilant societies and correspondingly smart and industrious investigation work. At best this is aimless activism. Either way trust has been broken. Big time. With great power comes great responsibility.