3 ms·
> Gonna be blunt here. What does that mean? Seems like you just stopped discussing the issue of trust and offered a bunch of opinions about people. > I don't
by zepto 5y ago
> Gonna be blunt here.
What does that mean? Seems like you just stopped discussing the issue of trust and offered a bunch of opinions about people.
> I don't value the opinions of those who believes that a de-wormer is useful medicine against a virus.
Were you aware that there are new clinical trials being done now to test the hypothesis?
Do you think you know better than the scientists who are conducting them?
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoI know about them. I also know that they couldn't draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of ivermectin, meaning that people who are currently using it might as well be rubbing crystals for all the good it will do them. Just because a scientist tries something, doesn't mean it's a cure or a treatment. It means they're making an attempt at understanding something. We already have treatments that work. Roundworm poison isn't going to save anybody.
- zepto 5y ago> I know about them. I also know that they couldn't draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of ivermectin, There are new studies being done now. We don’t know what them results will be. > meaning that people who are currently using it might as well be rubbing crystals for all the good it will do them. You don’t actually know that because you don’t know the results of the studies. > Just because a scientist tries something, doesn't mean it's a cure or a treatment. Of course, but it means they don’t think the matter is settled. You seem to be claiming it is, I.e. that you know better than the scientists conducting the studies.