> Just wait for antivaxers to hear 'DNA' and go wild. I'm no antivaxer. But given that there are alternatives like mRNA, where including RNA into human DNA is

> Just wait for antivaxers to hear 'DNA' and go wild. I'm no antivaxer. But given that there are alternatives like mRNA, where including RNA into human DNA is impossible due to missing reverse transcriptase mechanisms: Why should I take the risk of incorporating DNA into DNA, which is possible and frequently occurs with other viruses and gene therapies? Where are the arguments that at least hint at the safety of DNA vaccines, because I see none?