5 ms·
Or Brave. Safari gives me too many issues. Brave has all the compatibility you'd expect from chromium.
by kortex 5y ago
Or Brave. Safari gives me too many issues. Brave has all the compatibility you'd expect from chromium.
- gsich 5y agoIf Brave is keeping Chromium updated, then it is possible that this will effect them also.
- techrat 5y agoBrave is just a shitcoin mining, referral link hijacking reskin of Chrome.
- brnt 5y agoBy default it doesnt, and although I'd certainly advise going over all Brave's settings once, then you have the safest (as in not outdated like some other privacy forks) and privacy respecting Chrome based browser around.
- techrat 5y agoStop drinking the kool aid, buh. If you have to go over the settings... A safe, privacy respecting browser wouldn't resort to any shady tactics in the first place.
- brnt 5y agoI'm not drinking any koolaid, I just have not found anything better, apart from Firefox.
- nyolfen 5y agobrave's default settings are almost certainly exactly what a privacy-oriented person would choose. it does not mine crypto, and it only pays you in crypto to view notification ads if you opt-in. i even gave the ads a shot but decided it wasn't worth the $2 a month or whatever, so now i just have a maintained, de-googled chrome, which is basically a description of the optimal browser in 2021. does firefox ask you if you want to install pocket yet?
- m0zg 5y agoThey also run the only decent, independent search engine that has _its own_, _uncensored_ index. DDG was perceptibly worse than Google, but Brave Search is about on par, and the latency seems to be better as well. I maybe have to go to Google once or twice a month now instead of several times a day DDG would require. I know a bit about Google search, and frankly I'm stunned by what Brave was able to pull off here. I'm actually not against Firefox either, but they refuse to implement a profile switcher, and I need one to be able to fully and unambiguously isolate my work and personal accounts. What's particularly grating is that they already have profile support. Just not the UX to switch the profiles without pain.
- etc-hosts 5y ago> I'm actually not against Firefox either, but they refuse to implement a profile switcher https://davemartorana.com/multifirefox/ https://davemartorana.com/multifirefox/
- commoner 5y agoAlternatively, Profile Switcher for Firefox provides a Chrome-like interface: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/profile-switcher/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/profile-switc...
- happymellon 5y agoI couldn't tell from the link, but does it let me run two profiles side by side? This is the only thing that makes FF awkward for me when not using a Mac.
- tombrossman 5y agoYou can bookmark about:profiles and click "Launch profile in new browser" under each profile to open it in a new Firefox window. If you are using GNOME desktop you can also try this to integrate the profiles into the launcher. I wrote it when still using Ubuntu but I'm on Fedora now and it's the exact same steps: https://www.tombrossman.com/blog/2020/launch-firefox-profiles-directly-from-the-ubuntu-dash/ https://www.tombrossman.com/blog/2020/launch-firefox-profile...
- sumedh 5y agoI dont know much about Brave but thinking of moving to Brave on Mobile for ad blocking. Is Brave trustworthy for saving my Google credentials and credit card in the Browser?
- nyolfen 5y agoimo the adblocker isn't as good as ublock, which you can install anyway, so there's no major advantage there. the good part about brave is that you get the benefits of an up-to-date chromium browser without google recording your activity. you can take or leave the rest of the stuff, but there are a couple of neat extras like tor support for incognito and auto-detecting 404s and linking to archive.org.
- kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 5y agoAlso check out Bromite, which is chrome with ad blocking for android.