3 ms·

I wasn't trying to imply that this is hurting corporate as a whole, but questioning why take this particular hit in the first place. I'm also questioning if th

I wasn't trying to imply that this is hurting corporate as a whole, but questioning why take this particular hit in the first place. I'm also questioning if the status quo really is more profitable than actually selling the product. Is it really profitable to do this at all? Because the competition doesn't seem to be doing it.

DangitBobby 5y ago
The franchise owners are the ones who primarily get hurt from not being able to move product, not corporate. As long as being a franchise owner is still perceived as a viable way to make a living and the kickbacms they get from the arrangement outweigh their percentage of lost sales volume, what does corporate care?