3 ms·
> I dont know whether these people are stupid, or brainwashed by something. People like stories that they can grasp in general, and populism as a political tac
by spiralx 5y ago
> I dont know whether these people are stupid, or brainwashed by something.
People like stories that they can grasp in general, and populism as a political tactic provides an extremely simple narrative of a clear-cut "elite" group onto which almost any grievance can be projected as being caused by - and that makes it easy for people to paint themselves as heroic figures fighting evil and thus allow them to justify whatever means they use to get there.
And the effects of deprivation on people's health, cognition, mental health and relationships make it harder for people who are struggling to avoid embracing simple narratives that fit their biases. People who have everything and have never struggled a day in their life do the same after all, people are people at the end of the day.
Populism is the enemy of liberal democracy - and institutions in general - but the problem is that as a tactic it's easy and effective as a way of whipping people up as long as you don't care about and aren't affected by what happens after the angry mob is unleashed. Or if you're the rare true believer instead of being another cynical rabble-rouser.
- quantumBerry 5y agoI don't know how anyone could conflate Trumpism voting disbelief with Populism. Trump literally is the quintessential elite. I would argue Trumpism is Elitism, not Populism. Most people would probably say populism (political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group against "the elite" [wiki quote]) is pretty rational given the human condition of the modern US and the influences of our elite.
- DenisM 5y agoCesar was also one of elite, and yet he is the textbook example of populism.
- quantumBerry 5y agoI think you have a valid point. What kind of populist reforms do you attribute to Trump? Do you wish that Caesar would have killed the populist platform and eradicated the aiding of the urban poor, and just kept the parts of his platform that did nothing for the populace?