> Cause the whole article reads like "developers are whiny assholes who don't know shit about computers". And yes, it starts with an attack and ends with an att

> Cause the whole article reads like "developers are whiny assholes who don't know shit about computers". And yes, it starts with an attack and ends with an attack too. There is no attack in the text. There is a complaint that issues presented to operations often lack the basic level of detail and due diligence that they should have. You are free to disagree with the author's expected level of due diligence on issues; I think you'd be wrong to, but you can. However, it isn't an attack. You perceive a non-attack as an attack, and respond with an explicit attack and name-calling. That actually makes you the aggressor. Hmm, who is the asshole here?