3 ms·
And yet, they’ve made it much more difficult to pirate their suite now… I disagree with anyone who thinks Adobe, Microsoft, or any other software vendor made p
by vxNsr 5y ago
And yet, they’ve made it much more difficult to pirate their suite now…
I disagree with anyone who thinks Adobe, Microsoft, or any other software vendor made pirating easy bec it would boost long term sales.
100% of executives are focused on this quarter and nothing else.
Bad licensing enforcement was just a by-product of focus, and resources. As we see pirating O365 is impossible, pirating the offline Office suite is doable but much harder than it once was and usually requires buying a volume key instead of downloading a crack. I know pirating Adobe is technically possible but from what I’ve seen requires a lot more work and isn’t foolproof like it once was (download Adobe, click crack on crack software).
In general good software licensing frameworks have been commoditized and it’s pretty easy to add to your product. Idk anyone who would look at that and think rolling their own broken solution is better bec it could lead to better long term sales.
- duxup 5y ago>And yet, they’ve made it much more difficult to pirate their suite now… Nobody said you get the innovation you want. :(
- vxNsr 5y agoAs in pirating encouraged innovation in licensing? Fair. But it’s not really the argument that most people understand the headline to mean.
- MeinBlutIstBlau 5y agoI think because of their stranglehold and egregious fees, it's opening up other companies to compete reliably now. Although businesses just don't want to get away from the "Photoshop" or "Premier" name so they just shell out for it when they can easily get by without for way cheaper.
- vxNsr 5y agoRight but that would be an argument away from pirating, ie straight competition encourages innovation bec ppl don’t want to pay the egregious fees for software that they don’t fully utilize.