>The less physical feedback a keyboard gives you the more typos you make using it. Arguing that keyboards which encourage you to make typos are good is as stupi

>The less physical feedback a keyboard gives you the more typos you make using it. Arguing that keyboards which encourage you to make typos are good is as stupid… this is objectively true. This seems like a tenuous assumption. It completely ignores the main point I have, which is that different users have different preference. That’s why I brought up activation force, because my problem with the magic keyboard wasn’t the feedback, which I absolutely loved, but the activation force of the keys. I and many others have never found the amount of feedback on the Magic keyboard to be inadequate. You are projecting your personal perception that a large amount of key travel distance makes you type more accurately and is therefore desirable(to you), into an axiomatic truth about the nature of keyboards for everyone(i.e. that significant travel distance is needed to make a high quality keyboard and therefore shouldn’t be counted in a metric about the latency of inputs).