4 ms·
I don't understand. That's not what that PR says. That PR is about using == null. It offers no substantial information about is_instance_valid.
by nightowl_games 5y ago
I don't understand. That's not what that PR says. That PR is about using == null. It offers no substantial information about is_instance_valid.
- jay_kyburz 5y agoApologies, you might need to do some digging and research on your own. On Oct 2 @RandomShaper said "is_instance_valid() was made thread-safe, but it's still not something you can trust. An object allocated at the same address as a freed one will report a false positive. That's, of course, considering that what you want to check is that your variable is still pointing to the object you assigned, and not to just some object, which I think is the case. @reduz respoinded with "Ah that may be still the case of 3.2, but in 4.0 this function is 100% trustworthy"