3 ms·
It was a torpedo to the heart of the privacy marketing campaign they've spent who-knows-how-much-money building up over the past several years. That translates
by brundolf 5y ago
It was a torpedo to the heart of the privacy marketing campaign they've spent who-knows-how-much-money building up over the past several years. That translates directly to wasted dollars, which they do care about.
- echelon 5y agoWell done, screeching voices!
- wintermutestwin 5y agoBut isn't their privacy marketing: we will protect you from abusive surveillance capitalists, not we will protect you from state level actors?
- xvector 5y agoprivacy is privacy, you can't pretend to care about it while at the same time pushing something like this through
- wintermutestwin 5y ago>privacy is privacy Are you asking Apple to come out and say that they are supporting privacy against state-level actors? After snowyD, why would anyone believe that anyway? I'm not advocating against or for - I'm only wanting to add more clarity to the discussion because I think it is an important distinction that is often left out.
- lrem 5y agoWasn't there a very public "no, FBI, you cannot get the shooter's phone contents"?