> If we're looking at the end result, a mitigation of a loss of privacy is an increase in privacy compared to the alternative, no? I guess you could say that i

> If we're looking at the end result, a mitigation of a loss of privacy is an increase in privacy compared to the alternative, no? I guess you could say that in the same way that you can say that a gambler who just won $10 is "winning", even though their bank account is down $100,000. It only works if you completely lose all perspective.