The wording seems to point to the flexibility of the RISC-V ecosystem being the attraction here. I've never believed that Apple could do what they want with th

The wording seems to point to the flexibility of the RISC-V ecosystem being the attraction here. I've never believed that Apple could do what they want with the Arm ISA because they were a founding shareholder - they will be bound by a license agreement in the same way that other licensees are. RISC-V gives them the opportunity to add interesting ISA extensions for particular computational workloads. Edit: Whoever downvoted please tell me why I'm wrong on this - genuinely interested if there is evidence to the contrary!