It also leaves open the later mandate of removing opt-in. One can easily imagine a large international crisis where truth is relative depending on where you are

It also leaves open the later mandate of removing opt-in. One can easily imagine a large international crisis where truth is relative depending on where you are but where writing about something might be deemed as dangerous and harmful misinformation which has to be erased. Imagine Wikipedia during WW2 for example for conflict. It's an inverse tower of babel situation - a kind of hubris where the aim of reducing differences leads to a greater evil. The hubris is that clever westerners think its possible to fit everyone into the same way of mind and if that happens then they will touch heaven.