4 ms·
It won't defeat manual edit, nor do the authors claim it. They do however make a solid point in saying it will defeat cheap automated manipulation / deepfakes a
by VSerge 5y ago
It won't defeat manual edit, nor do the authors claim it. They do however make a solid point in saying it will defeat cheap automated manipulation / deepfakes at scale that would otherwise be easy with inpainting features.
Anything that can help us differentiate authentic images from manipulated ones, especially when it comes to news, is imo a welcome addition in the arsenal of societies attached to the concept of verifiable facts.
- terryf 5y agoAuthentic images do not exist. They always include a viewpoint. Example here: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rHeyzklapsE/W5-yUBVnbxI/AAAAAAAAAV8/aSkhUIpu07oSWd-zK2KNpWlit_tBD34zACLcBGAs/s1600/17684960-37071110-37-0-1512736896-1512736898-650-1-1512736898-650-67540fb40a-1512806202.jpg https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rHeyzklapsE/W5-yUBVnbxI/AAAAAAAAA...
- rocqua 5y agoI'd say cropping an image leaves the image 'authentic'. Even if it changes the meaning. It's when you start painting out objects that you are making a 'non-authentic' picture.