4 ms·
>we've never lost a craft Can you explain? My comment was in the context of Columbia. “An investigation board determined that a large piece of foam fell from
by bumby 5y ago
>we've never lost a craft
Can you explain? My comment was in the context of Columbia.
“An investigation board determined that a large piece of foam fell from the shuttle's external tank and breached the spacecraft wing.”[1]
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt with your definition of “we”. But your tone seems to point directly to the types of biases I referred to. It’s worthwhile to research the history of the industry as an whole.[2] Prior to the disaster, do you know NASAs response? “Foam shedding happens all the time…it’s ‘in family’ and not a problem.” It was still out of spec for a good reason. The term from the investigation report is “normalization of deviance”.
It seems even as technology progresses, we’ll still be anchored by faults in human psychology.
[1] https://www.space.com/amp/19436-columbia-disaster.html https://www.space.com/amp/19436-columbia-disaster.html
[2]https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html
- randomswede 5y agoI think it was an attempt to illustrate the biases that play in and cause safety regulation to be written in blood. Either an attempt at a quote from within NASA, or actually one (I am insufficiently familiar with the entire background of the broken tile to say).